![]() ![]() ![]() Once all the data has been processed and presented, children can then work in groups to evaluate the best and worst areas, and then to devise strategies as to how they might suggest that improvements can be made.Can quality of life be measured? The existence of reputed rankings and assessments, such as those produced by Mercer or the OECD, point to this conclusion – as their differences indicate that each ranking uses different indicators and weightings. Two well know example websites include Zoopla and Checkmyfile. Additional data can come from the internet in the form of geo-demographic data which is postcode derived. Also video/DVD and audio files, for example podcasts, can be used as part of the evidence portfolio. Of course, annotated photographs can be used to ‘paint a picture' of what somewhere is like (a geographical narrative). Various techniques can be used to display information, for example radar plots (figure two) or a rose diagram showing visual quality data (figure three). Data and maps can be obtained from the Office of National Statistics' Neighbourhood statistics website. It makes sense to use census units, for example output areas, (so that other secondary information can be added to the picture. Street appearance: safety for pedestrians, crowdedness, street cleanliness, etc Quality of shops: type, other land use, quality of goods, number of vacant units, etc. Looks at shopping quality and street appearance. Criteria: deterioration of walls, peeling paint, slipped tiles, broken glass, broken gutters, etc Range of options none, little, some, much. Physical condition of buildings/index of decay. Criteria include: size of words, size of pictures, style of writing, visible from, method of writing/inscription, for example pen, paint, etc Absence of burglar alarm, security cameras, metal bars on windows, metal shutters, neighbourhood watch sticker etc Criteria might include, obviousness of pollution, litter, smalls, state of buildings, impact on surrounding area Scores from zero to three: no pollution - badly polluted. stimulating, ugly versus attractive, crowded versus peaceful, threatening versus welcoming, drab versus colourful. Based on gut feelings, for example boring vs. There are additional techniques that can be used, as shown in below: The number of locations should be a reflection of the location area (population density) and the amount of time required. The basic primary data for this investigation is obtained from surveys of land use plus housing condition and environmental quality at various sample sites in chosen areas. Such effects will impact on the quality of life for residents in the surrounding local areas and often decline with increasing distance from the nuisance. ![]() There are also dis-amenities in cities, features that have a negative effect on local environmental conditions, such as a polluting incinerator or noisy nightclub. By recording, mapping and analysing spatial variations in different features and indicators, the investigation can start to examine the cause and effect of such inequality, or the impact of planning decisions or redevelopment schemes. Quality of life investigations and fieldwork focus on the inequalities between different areas within a city or ward. Other indicators, such as traffic levels, complete the picture of a particular area. However, the term is often used in urban studies of towns or cities to represent a multiple index of different criteria that reflects residents' housing standards and the environmental conditions in which they live. The PQLI is the average of three characteristics: Literacy, life expectancy and infant mortality. The quality of life at a national or global scale is measured by the Physical Quality of Life Index (PQLI), devised in the 1980s. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |